GOLD$4,821.00|
SILVER$80.30|
PLATINUM$985.00|
PALLADIUM$960.00
|
GOLD$4,821.00|
SILVER$80.30|
PLATINUM$985.00|
PALLADIUM$960.00
|
Au:Ag60.0
Delayed 5 min
Purchasing Power

Average Home in Gold

Ounces of gold to buy an average US home · Quotes delayed up to 5 minutes
goldpurchasing-powerhousingmonetary-thesis
to
Absolute values (dollar price)
Percentage change from start of period
Logarithmic scale — shows proportional changes equally
50-day Simple Moving Average — short-term trend
200-day Simple Moving Average — long-term trend
Relative Strength Index (14-period) — overbought above 70, oversold below 30
Moving Average Convergence Divergence (12/26/9) — trend & momentum signal

The number of ounces of gold required to purchase an average U.S. home, plotted from 1970 to the present. In 1970, a home cost approximately 600 ounces of gold — a reflection of the fixed $35/oz gold price. The chart shows a dramatic long-term decline as gold repriced freely after 1971. The home is far more expensive in dollar terms than in 1970, but far cheaper in gold terms. This is the cleanest single visualization of the dollar’s debasement against hard assets across half a century, and it reframes the question of whether housing is expensive in the only currency that matters: a stable monetary unit.

Analyst's Note

The gold-priced home chart contains a 1971 inflection — the year Nixon closed the gold window and severed the dollar’s last formal link to gold. Before 1971, the gold-priced home was in the 500–700 ounce range, reflecting the fixed $35/oz gold price against rising nominal home values. After 1971, the long downward trend in gold-priced housing began as gold repriced freely, with cyclical interruptions during periods of dollar strength. Recent years have produced the steepest decline since the 1970s, consistent with accelerated monetary debasement. For the analytical investor, the chart is a regime indicator: when the gold-priced home is making fresh lows, monetary debasement is in an acute phase. When it stabilizes, currencies have temporarily reasserted their store-of-value function. The chart’s ultimate utility is conversational: it reframes the affordability debate in a way that is hard to argue with.